SHERI COMMENTS: The first thing that occurs to me about this video, is that the man presenting it makes no effort to hide his identity, in that there is no distortion of his face or voice and his jumper is clearly marked with a traceable logo, so it is possible to find this man and question him further on the video. Also, he states that the reason he was in the woods was to look for bears, ie not bigfoot. This suggests a lack of bias in the search or any data gathered. He also does not state what he thinks the creature is (be it bear, man, bigfoot or anything else), so there is no obvious effort to sway the perception of the viewer. This, to me, suggests reliability in the source of this footage.
However, when the image of the figure is shown, there is no indication of scale and, therefore, the size of the creature. There is also only a brief glimpse of it. We get no time to determine how it moves to attempt to relate it to any other type of known animal. It could easily be a man in a ghillie suit, rather than a bigfoot, or some other unknown creature. The slow motion appears to show a man-shaped creature, but there are limited frames, and bears have been known to look man-like for the length of time shown in this film. It could also just be a man. It is primarily unidentifiable and, whilst it could be a bigfoot, it cannot be said to be anything definite and, therefore, cannot be seen as strong evidence towards the existence of a bigfoot.