WELCOME TO THE CFZ BLOG NETWORK: COME AND JOIN THE FUN

Half a century ago, Belgian Zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans first codified cryptozoology in his book On the Track of Unknown Animals.

The Centre for Fortean Zoology (CFZ) are still on the track, and have been since 1992. But as if chasing unknown animals wasn't enough, we are involved in education, conservation, and good old-fashioned natural history! We already have three journals, the largest cryptozoological publishing house in the world, CFZtv, and the largest cryptozoological conference in the English-speaking world, but in January 2009 someone suggested that we started a daily online magazine! The CFZ bloggo is a collaborative effort by a coalition of members, friends, and supporters of the CFZ, and covers all the subjects with which we deal, with a smattering of music, high strangeness and surreal humour to make up the mix.

It is edited by CFZ Director Jon Downes, and subbed by the lovely Lizzy Bitakara'mire (formerly Clancy), scourge of improper syntax. The daily newsblog is edited by Corinna Downes, head administratrix of the CFZ, and the indexing is done by Lee Canty and Kathy Imbriani. There is regular news from the CFZ Mystery Cat study group, and regular fortean bird news from 'The Watcher of the Skies'. Regular bloggers include Dr Karl Shuker, Dale Drinnon, Richard Muirhead and Richard Freeman.The CFZ bloggo is updated daily, and there's nothing quite like it anywhere else. Come and join us...

A Special Offer

A Special Offer

New CFZ Titles at a bargain Price

        

Search This Blog

Loading...

Sunday, June 26, 2011

LINDSAY SELBY: How easy is it to fake something?

After all this talk about fake stuff to do with bigfoot,I am not going to go into the debate about the face print, footprints etc, I decided to see how easy it is to fake a photo. I took a photo I had taken at Loch Ness in 2000 and added a couple of humps. I have deliberately posted the photo so you can see it has been scanned in so no one tries to use it.

By sticking the humps on a shadow in the water that was already in the photo,I was amazed how real it could have looked if scanned again and especially if turned into black and white. So It is that easy. But the question still remains -why would anyone deliberately mislead people by doing that? To a genuine researcher, this sort of fraud is just beyond comprehension , and means it makes the cryptid a joke, so that very few scientists will get involved in any attempt at serious study.

Modern technology makes it too easy, even a know nothing about photography like myself, can do it.

2 comments:

Dale Drinnon said...

My comment for some decades now has been that still photography has reached the point where you can convincingly fake just about anything and for that reason, photographs no longer provide satisfactory proof of anything anymore.

I was also just corresponding this morning over the Rines underwater photos taken at Loch Ness in the 1970s: I said that before anybody had tried it, most people seemed to think all you needed to do was to stick a camera in the water and take photos of the Loch Ness Monster: but when the results came out they were so bad that nobody ever tried to do it that way over again. Once was enough.

It is actually much easier to fake photos than to go to all the bother of trying for the real ones any more.

Best Wishes, Dale D.

Kwin the Eskimo said...

Thank you for this post and the exquisite nature of the reporting on this blog. I long ago abandoned a "popular" cryptozoology blog because it turned into a sensational, tabloidesque mess that spent more time promoting bad crypto TV than reporting legit stories. Thank all that is good that "Still on the Track" exists as a beacon in these stormy cryptid seas. Best regards.