The risk assessment will cost £47 before any moles have even been trapped, whereas before the area was taken over by Durham County Council, a local mole-catcher would usually charge £30 maximum, without the need for any fannying about and form-filling beforehand. But the council reckon that the previous chap wasn't qualified enough. In the meantime, the problem got worse.
Monday, March 14, 2011
LIZ CLANCY: Mole Madness
I'm a bit late with this one, but apparently back in February Durham County Council insisted upon a risk assessment before pest control experts could rid two cemeteries of moles. Rookhope and Cowshill had been plagued by the little blighters for some time but when Councillor John Shuttleworth asked for something to be done he was told via email that the traps had been ordered but he would have to wait a week for a health and safety officer to assess the area before the trapping could be done.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
This sort of thing is common with councils, you know. A friend of mine runs a web development company, and once replied to a Council advert for some webdev work. It was pretty basic stuff; develop web pages according to a house style, with links in between pages and so on; nothing a decent content management system can't manage, and certainly not a big job for semi-automated web development.
The kicker was that the Council required proof that the company doing the work didn't discriminate against assorted ethnic groups (it didn't), used green energy whatever that is, was eco-friendly and so on and on for several pages. Proving all of these things would have cost several thousand pounds, on a contract worth only a few hundred.
So, the web developer simply replied with the words "I cannot and will not prove any of that; I'm a web developer not a bloody performing seal! I'll do the work for that agreed cost, and if you want any more you can damn well pay for it in advance!"
The council wibbled at him for a while, then disappeared back in the direction of their normal contractors who then overcharged them several times over for a lamentably simple job. The council likely didn't much mind; after all it wasn't their money that was being wasted but that of their council tax payers.
Post a Comment