The controversy over this blasted picture continues. Dale Drinnon wrote this afternoon: "I am very much surprised to see that the reference article on the "Water Blackfella" (Formerly "Bigfoot") photo still accepts it as genuine, despite the blog posting that says it is a hoax.
It IS a hoax, it is a model and from the apparent scale, it is no more than a few inches tall: a toy. The wonder of it all is that it continues to circulate. "
I agree with Dale totally, of course it's a hoax. And it's not even a particulaarly good one. So I went back to the posting in question and re-read it. Its a matter of semantics, but David Lee seems of the same opinion as us. Yes, its a hoax, and the link was to another story purporting to be the source of it.
Now Neil Arnold has steeped into the fray, and he reckons it was in Strange Magazine years ago, but will be looking for the original source for us.
I am actually finding this fascinating, and can't wait to see what happens next
Sunday, April 12, 2009
THE "WATER BLACKFELLA PICTURE": Controversy continues
Labels:
australia,
bhm,
centre for fortean zoology,
cfz,
cryptozoology,
fakes and frauds,
guyana,
humanoid
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment