If This Was In The Pacific Northwest, would it be Bigfoot?
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Half a century ago, Belgian Zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans first codified cryptozoology in his book On the Track of Unknown Animals.
The Centre for Fortean Zoology (CFZ) are still on the track, and have been since 1992. But as if chasing unknown animals wasn't enough, we are involved in education, conservation, and good old-fashioned natural history! We already have three journals, the largest cryptozoological publishing house in the world, CFZtv, and the largest cryptozoological conference in the English-speaking world, but in January 2009 someone suggested that we started a daily online magazine! The CFZ bloggo is a collaborative effort by a coalition of members, friends, and supporters of the CFZ, and covers all the subjects with which we deal, with a smattering of music, high strangeness and surreal humour to make up the mix.
Unlike some of our competitors we are not going to try and blackmail you into donating by saying that we won't continue if you don't. That would just be vulgar, but our lives, and those of the animals which we look after, would be a damn sight easier if we receive more donations to our fighting fund. Donate via Paypal today...
2 comments:
Possibly-but this object (?a purported track cast?)actually has no features to identify it as a (?print?) of any kind of a foot other than a similarity in shape. There are no individual toes and no other identifiable anatomical hallmarks which would indicate a ball of the foot or any skeletal structure inside the footprint, if that is what it is being stated to be.
just a bit of fun actually mate, like the fox carcass I did last time. More oddities to come.
Post a Comment