[National Geographic Painting of Arctic Neanderthals]
VI. -The Toonijuk
Ivan Sanderson, "Things", 1967, Pyramid Books
Chapter 9 (pages 93-107)
The possibility of the continued existence of some fully haired or
furred human primitives, submen, or even possibly subhominids [apes] on the continent of North America has now for long been mooted. Most of these have originated from north of a line that may be drawn from about the 40th parallel (i.e.80 miles north of San Francisco) on the west coast of the United States; north up the eastern face of the Cascades; around the Guttered Scablands of Oregon; to the Idaho Rockies in the region of the Salmon River.
Thence, this line of southern demarcation crosses the Rockies to their eastern face in Montana, and then runs (back) northwest to the lower Nahanni Valley about the Laird River in the Canadian Northwest Territories [and thence all the way down the Yukon to the Behring Strait]. From that point it travels southeast through the northern third of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba to the south of the great Clay Belt, rimming James Bay of Hudson Hay, and thence continues almost due cast to Cape St.Charles at the eastern extremity of Labrador. Immediately west of Lake Superior, however, one report emanates from the true wilderness
area of extreme northern Minnesota.
These reports were previously for the most part concentrated
around the lower Fraser River area of British Columbia, and north up the coast of that province. In this area Burns and others have reported upon many dozen cases of alleged sightings of such creatures and finds of their foot-tracks. They are, in that area, called Sasquatches, a coined name derived from several similar-sounding names for them given by various indigenous Amerindian tribes. The existence of such very large if not truly "giant" (seven feet or over) creatures thereabouts has always been fully accepted by the Amerinds and of later years has become quite widely current among white people. In the unopened strip of forested territory along the coast and on the multitudinous islands off that coast their existence is fully accepted by everybody, and it is notable that when the Amerinds of that area speak of them in English, they call them
"apes," though they still assert that they show many human traits-- notably, being able to throw stones, over-arm, with great force and accuracy. It should be noted that as Prof. Kortlandt has recently suggested no animal, other than man, is known to be able to perform this act.
The matter of the Sasquatches, however, has until recently been
considered so esoteric that anthropologists have not only failed to take it seriously but also have not found it worthwhile reading the reports, all of which have necessarily been by non-specialists without scientific training, and have, unfortunately, been published in the daily press or popular magazines. Nevertheless, the body of reports from the British Columbia area that are now on record--and including some official ones, and several sworn affidavits--is quite considerable, and at least one properly equipped scientific expedition was launched, in 1962, in pursuit of them.
There have, however, also been rumors and reports of similar
creatures made throughout the past century, emanating from a very much wider area; in fact, from all over the subarctic and arctic regions of North America north of the line demarcated above, and all the way from Alaska to Labrador and north even it to Greenland. During the course of some twenty years' research into the question of what have unfortunately become popularly and almost universally known as "abominable snowmen" (and which we have recently designated "ABSM's"), a number of these reports came to our attention, but always secondhand, even as regards their
alleged publication. It was therefore decided some years ago to endeavor to track down the original statements. This effort has now brought to light a number of important items, which are herewith preliminarily discussed, but none of these is yet in any way exhaustively researched, as will be noted in the body of the text below. From each, a number of further references have been obtained. At this stage of our investigations, however,
we have to put on record our surprise at the wealth of this material, and
even more so at the recent date of the publication of a great part of
it. That such reports--and coming from persons of such standing as Knud V.J. Rasmussen --could be universally ignored, seems inexplicable.
As will be further discussed below, [Harold]Gladwin, over a decade ago, suggested in a scientific-though in some aspects wholly unacceptable--context [Men Out of Asia, a popular book meant for the general public and thoroughly illustrated with humorous cartoons-DD] that several waves of extreme primitives (including some, in his opinion, of pigmy stature); of submen [(in the form of Neanderthalers); and possibly even of subhominids, which we would today probably assign to the Pithecantbropine branch of the anthropoid stem of the Primates, {but on up to the Australoid type of modern primitives and NOT differentiating the Australoids from any older more primitive peoples}] crossed the Bering Strait and populated the Americas. If Gladwin was right in this basic suggestion, almost everything that we have to say hereunder
displays perfect conformity.
[It should be noted that Sanderson badly misrepresented what Gladwin had said and in fact he need not have invoked Gladwin at all. Gladwin was more interested in the later waves of humanity to populate the New World, and he assuled basically via Beringia. The Australoids were Gladwin's first wave, NOT specifying any others but broadly hinting at them. The successive waves included five more different ethnic types and culminating in a last wave of mixed Middle-Easterners and Orientals bearing civilzation to the New World via the idling fleet left behind by Alexander the Great! Which is great fun but basically only popularizing a series of older Anthropological notions circulating since the turn of the twentieth century. Gladwin for example frequently cites Roland Dixon in The Racial History of Man, and if you were to make a serious statement of the theory, the best course of action would be to cite Dixon and not Gladwin.This is of course all Anthropology As Is Currently Severely Denied-DD]
Pre-Amerindian Man was in North America and probably South America. Nobody can any longer deny this fact, for these proto-Amerinds have left us too many ["Pre-Projectile-Point"] artifacts and encampment sites that, by radiocarbon and other precise dating methods, have now been shown to be of origins prior to the last,
and possibly even to the one-but-last [eg, Calico Hill], southward advance of the polar ice.
There is no reason to suppose that all these types were wiped out prior to post-glacial times, and there is no evidence that they were so exterminated; while there is now considerable evidence that some may have survived until today in the vast and as yet unexplored territories of the far north.
The Eskimos of today maintain a large body of tradition about a race of very primitive people with revolting habits who occupied their territories prior to their own arrival. This tradition spreads all the way from Alaska to Greenland and throughout the Canadian Arctic Islands. These creatures are said to have been very tall, fully haired, dim-witted and retiring; but to have fought savagely among themselves, been carnivorous, and to have gone [sometimes partially to fully-]naked, though they built circular encampments of very large stones with whale-rib and skin roofs.
[PreDorset House Ring, 1500BC NWT]
[Litter of PreDorset Stone Tools]
The Eskimos say they had primitive stone and bone implements.
[Advanced-Mousterian Neanderthal Stone Tools]
They are referred to today on Baffin Island and north to Greenland as "Toonijuk" but are called by many different though similar names to the west. This tradition has been reported upon by many, including Rasmussen and, most notably, by Katharine Scherman in her Spring on an Arctic Island. Rasmussen has even stated that some of these creatures [Actually, archaic types of "Paleo-Eskimoes" mistakenly identified with the Toonijuk-DD] existed in Greenland within the current century but were driven up into some "inaccessible valleys" by Eskimos. This, as Scherman has pointed out, seems hardly credible, since the interior of that country immediately behind the narrow coastal strip is an ice cap. However, there are still large areas of Greenland not fully explored despite massive air-travel over much of its periphery. Also, the extreme north, around the Cape Maurice Jesup area, is not glaciated and is extremely hard of access over land, and even from the sea, due to its fjord-like topography.
These Toonijuk are said by the Eskimos to have been of giant size [Again, 7 feet tall and up] and to have had some exceptional and, to them as well as to us, disgusting habits. They are said to have preferred rotten meat [ie, they scavenged corpses]and, it is alleged,
their females tucked meat under their clothing (?) to promote
decomposition by their body-warmth. Further, since they did not know how to cure skins, they are said to have wetted them and then worn these raw to dry them; and then to have used them for bedding. Perhaps the most peculiar custom ascribed to the Toonijuk, as reported by Scherman, is that young men were sewn up in fresh seal skins containing "worms"(maggots) which, by sucking their blood, reduced their weight and so made them fleet, lightweight hunters.[This is recognisable instead as a reference to a sort of Shamanic initiation story-DD] These maggots are believed by the Eskimos to have been fostered in the rotting carcasses of birds and one such--an auk--was said by Rasmussen to have been discovered in Greenland in his time and to have been declared by the local Eskimos to have been left there by a party of Toonijuk who, they said, had only just fled back into these "inaccessible valleys" of the interior. While regarded as being utterly primitive, the Toonijuk are said to have lived in underground houses (though without sleeping platforms) and to have had pottery--or at least "cooking pots"--and some weapons. In Greenland, the Eskimos say that they went naked but that their bodies were covered with feather-like fur; in more westerly areas, they are said to have used skin clothing. Everybody agrees that they were very good hunters; could call game by voice or gesture; and were so strong that they could back [sic] an adult Bearded Seal. [More recent artwork found on the internet shows them hauling full-grown walruses around on their gigantic backs-DD]
In addition to these details, Scherman records--from information obtained from the Eskimos of north Baffinland, as transcribed by P. J. Murdoch, an agent of the Hudson's Bay
Company, who speaks fluent local Eskimo--that the Toonijuk were not dangerous to the Eskimo but, to the contrary, were very timid and cowardly, and were particularly afraid of dogs, which they apparently did not understand. All agree that they fought a great deal among themselves, but some Eskimos assert that their own ancestors hunted the Toonijuk down individually [Because they were cannibals-DD] and so eventually exterminated them. Yet, Greenlanders insist that even today some linger on in their country but that they are excessively wary--in fact, more so than animals.
Scherman further notes that: "Until 1902 an extremely primitive tribe of Thule people lived on Southampton Island, and some of their customs were those (alleged to be) of the Toonijuk." (The Thule along with groups named the Dorset Islanders and the Sarquaq, constitute known previous inhabitants of the Canadian Islands and the far north.)
[Reconstructed Dorset Inuit from his remains after DNA analysis]
[Pre-Dorset Mask-Possibly depicting a Tornait]
[The Toonijuk are sometimes equated with the Thule and Dorset Paleo-Eskimos, who are known mostly through their remains, and it is the remains of their houses and implements that the later Inuit pointed to as evidence of the former race of Hairy Giants.These people were however not giants and are known to be merely earlier and less-advanced waves of Inuit settlers into the area, each new wave displacing the older wave before it. Evidently the tradition confuses them all and collapses them together, especially when speaking of "Survivors still living in the back country"-DD]
Scherman(1955) herself visited what was then stated by the Eskimos of Baffinland to be a Toonijuk settlement on Bylot Island, and gives a clear description of it. In a small isolated valley her party was shown a series of circular mounds. These proved to be composed of very large stories half buried in the permafrost. Each circle was dug out and had obviously once been roofed; they were entered by what had been a three-foot high tunnel; were paved with large flat stones; and had stone benches at the back. Around the walls were very old rotten bones of the Greenland Right Whale. The party was greatly impressed by the ability of' the original builders to have dug so deeply into the permafrost with only crude stone and bone implements; and, even more so, by their having transported these enormous stones, which were not of local origin, even if they had had the use of dogs and sleds. Their Eskimo companions told them that the Toonijuk could lift rocks that no Eskimo could handle; that their houses were roofed with whale ribs; and that two whale jawbones were placed on either side of the entrance tunnel. However, this site, as Scherman remarks, showed abundant signs of having been occupied by Eskimos [not Toonijuk-DD] for long and frequent periods since its original construction. It is most significant to note that the description of these round-houses coincides very closely with the Neolithic [Megalithic] "Round-Houses" of the Shetlands, Orkneys, and the Hebrides off the coast of Scotland, which also were circular, sunk about three feet, surrounded by stone walls that rose some three feet above the ground, and had domed roofs made of a "wheel" of large whale ribs over which skins, peat-sod, or other insulating material was placed. [There is a separate theory that some of the stone structures of the American Arctic were built ny Megalith-builders from Northern Europe, for which see the recent book The FarFarers-DD]
The Eskimo still make stone igloos with ingeniously constructed roofs of overlapping stone slabs and which also have tunnel entrances--but they are of nothing like the size described; nor do the stones of which they are built in any way approach the size of those used in the structures said to have been built by the Toonijuk.But of even more interest is the description of a nearby cairn of very large stones, which had partly collapsed. The interior of this is said to have been hollow, and in it lay a number of large human bones. One
of the party leaned in and extracted what is said to have been a female pelvis; but, as there were no professional anthropologists in the party, they very properly replaced this and closed up the cairn to the best of their ability. Scherman quite rightly makes a strong plea for this site to be visited by competent experts and thoroughly examined before such potentially priceless relics finally disintegrate; and she ends by asking the pertinent question "Aside from the Toonijuk, if they ever existed, who else could have been here?"
Her only other thought is that they could have been Norsemen, whose sturdy build and stature, greater than that of the Eskimo, coupled with their propensity for feuding, might have given rise to legends that in time became transferred from one alien race to another; and she ends with the extremely significant remark that there were traditions and apparently detailed knowledge of
[?Megalithic] White Men among the Eskimos long before.
[The following passages seem extraneous to me and I have left them out Graves of Pygmies have nothing to do with stories of Giants, and a four-footed creature with pointed heels that leaves marks of claws in its tracks is most likely a bear. -DD]
[The Following supplemental Traditional material comes from the internet: THE TORNIT:
In olden times the Inuit were not the only inhabitants of the country in which they live at the present time. Another tribe similar to them shared their hunting ground. But they were on good terms, both tribes living in harmony in the villages. The Tornit were much taller than the Inuit and had very long legs and arms. Almost all of them were blear eyed. They were extremely: strong and could lift large boulders, which were by far too heavy for the Tunit. But even the Inuit of that time w ere much stronger than those of today, and some large stones are shown on the palm of Miliaqdjuin, in Cumberland Sound, with which the ancient Inuit used to play, throwing them great distances. Even the strongest men of the present generations are scarcely able to lift them, much less to swing them or throw them any distance.
The Tornit lived on walrus, seals, and deer, just as the Eskimo do nowadays, but their methods of hunting were different. The principal part of their winter dress was a long and wide coat of deerskins, similar to the jumper of the Eskimo, but reaching down to the knees and trimmed with leather straps. When sealing in winter they wore this garment, the lower edge of which was fastened on the snow by means of pegs. Under the jacket they carried a small lamp, called tumiujang (literally, resembling a footprint) or quming over which they melted snow in a small pot. Some Eskimo say that they opened the seals as soon as they were caught and cooked some meat over these lamps. When the seal blew in the hole they whispered, "Kapatipara" (I shall stab it) and, when they had hit it, "Igdluiliq." Frequently they forgot about the lamp and in throwing the harpoon upset it and burned their skin.
All their weapons were made of stone. For the blades of their knives they used green slate (uluqsaq, literally material for women's knives), which was fastened by ivory pins to a bone or ivory handle.
The points of their harpoons were made of bone, ivory, or slate; those of their lances, of flint or quartz, which was also used for drill heads; and they made neither kayaks nor bows. Their method of hunting deer was remarkable. In a deer pass, where the game could not escape, they erected a file of cairns across the valley and connected them by ropes. Some of the hunters hid behind the cairns , while others drove the deer toward them. As the animals were unable to pass the rope they fled along it, looking for an exit, and while attempting to pass a cairn were lanced by the waiting hunter, who seized the body by the hind legs and drew it behind the line.
This tale is related as a proof of their enormous strength and it is said that they were able to hold a harpooned walrus as the Eskimo hold a seal.
The Tornit could not clean the sealskins so well as the Inuit, but worked them up with part of the blubber attached. Their way of preparing meat was disgusting, since they let it become putrid and placed it between the thigh and the belly to warm it.
The old stone houses of the Tornit can be seen everywhere. Generally they did not build snow houses, but lived the whole winter in stone buildings, the roofs of which were frequently supported by whale ribs. Though the Eskimo built similar structures they can be easily distinguished from one another, the bed of their huts being much larger than that of the Tornit.
Though both tribes lived on very good terms, the Inuit did not like to play at ball with the Tornit, as they were too strong and used large balls, with which they hurt their playfellows severely.
A remarkable tradition is told referring to the emigration of this people. The Tornit did not build any kayaks, but as they were aware of the advantages afforded by their use in hunting they stole the boats from the Inuit, who did not dare to defend their property, the Tornit being by far their superiors in strength. Once upon a time a young Tuniq had taken the kayak of a young Inung without asking him and had injured it by knocking in the bottom. The Inung got very angry and ran a knife into the nape of the Tuniq's neck while he was sleeping. (According to another tradition he drilled a hole into his head; this form is also recorded in Labrador .) The Tornit then became afraid that the Inuit would kill them all and preferred to leave the country for good. They assembled at Qernirtung (a place in Cumberland Sound), and in order to deceive any pursuers they cut off the tails of their jumpers and tied their hair into a bunch protruding from the crown of the head. [The hair sticking up in a bunch from the top of the head might be a symbol of this lost people-DD]
In another form of the tradition it is said that while playing with the Tornit a young Inung fell down and broke his neck. The Tornit feared that the Inuit might take revenge upon them and left the country.
Many old ditties are sung which either treat of the Tornit or are reported to have been sung by them. Some of them will be found in the linguistic account connected with my journey."
http://www.itk.ca/english/inuit_canada/history/tunnit.htm ]
...Through the mail, the author has received over the past fifteen years a number of letters from interested parties, giving accounts of alleged ABSMs in a large number of localities spread all across Canada from the Mackenzie, Stikine, and Rocky Mountains in the west, to Labrador in the east. During the past years, over a hundred such letters have been received, but only two of these warrant comment at this time. The first relates an incident alleged to have occurred about 1911 in the northern tip of the State of Minnesota. As received (from a lady who was a resident of said district at the time) two men were hunting in the deep forest several miles from a small town in that state when they came upon some strange foot-tracks. Following these, they came up with what they described as "a human giant which had long arms and short, light hair, covering most of its body" (italics mine). One man remained while the other ran back to town, collected a posse, and returned. The woods
were then beaten for a considerable distance but nothing more than the tracks were found. Northern Minnesota is on the southern fringe of the great northern boreal forests and, even today, little but a highroad separates it from them.[I have almost the same exact story told as a "Ghost Story" and reported to me by one of the Reference Librarians at Indiana University at Indianapolis, but located due north of that location and even in the tundra areas East of Lake Dubawnt, story being told to me in the 1980s, having been told before in 1970s and presumably relating to events a decade or two earlier. Those tracks apparently showed no individual toes-DD]
If ABSMs existed in those forests in 1910, there is no reason why one should not have wandered south to this point. Of significance in this report is the color of the hair. It agrees
with several reports of the larger Sasquatches. The other item of interest is a series of new expressions on the nature of the famous "Wendigos" or "Wentigos" of the northern forest
Amerinds. These ghosts, spirits, or demons of Amerindian myth and legend have always had much in common with the "Trolls" of Scandinavia and other traditional humanoid monsters in other parts of the northern subarctic. In a brief article for a Canadian magazine, a retired fur-trader related a description of Wentigos given to him by an old Cree of Amisk Lake, named George Custer. This, like other previous descriptions, stated that Wentigos were mentally unbalanced persons who did not respond to treatment by local medicine men and who, being exiled to the woods, developed certain supernatural aspects. However, George Custer's description mentions that medicine men could "smell" them at a great distance[They smelled of dung clinging to their hair in another passage cited by ITS]; that they traveled in packs like foxes[wolves?]; followed trails but always kept off them; defended themselves by biting; lived underground; and were finally exterminated by his people. In fact, it seems clear that there is much of ancient factual observation of ABSM-type primitives involved in the tradition of the Wendigo--a tradition that incidentally, is spread almost all across Canada. (The Wendigo, Windigo, Whitico, or "Ice-Giant" of the Algonquians is of the same tradition.) One of the most extraordinary accounts of what we call ABSMs that has come to my attention may be found in a book entitled True North, by Elliott Merrick, and concerns certain affairs on the Traverspine River at a point where that stream flows into the Grand or Hamilton River near Goose Bay, Labrador; and specifically at the homestead of a family named Michelin. The date was about 1913. The author of this book regarded the report as a "ghost-story" and notes that such are very real in what he describes as "this land of scattered, lonely houses, and primitive fears."
However, in the light of discoveries made since his book was published, one may perhaps now legitimately consider it in quite another light. It is best quoted directly; and for permission to do this we are indebted to the publishers, Messrs. Charles Scribner & Sons, of New York. The pertinent passage reads as follows: "About twenty years ago one of the little girls was playing in an open grassy clearing one autumn afternoon when she saw come out of the woods a huge hairy thing with low hanging arms. It was about seven feet tall when it stood erect, but sometimes it dropped to all fours [dropping to all fours to get under cover in the bushes is a common feature of such reports-DD]. Across the top of
its head was a white mane. She said it grinned at her and she could see its white teeth. When it beckoned to her she ran screaming to the house. Its tracks were everywhere in the mud and sand, and later in the snow. They measured the tracks and cut out paper patterns of them, which they still keep. It is a strange-looking foot, about twelve inches long, narrow at the heel and forking at the front into two broad, round-ended toes.[footgear again?-DD]
Sometimes its print was so deep it looked to weigh 500 pounds. At other times the beast's mark looked no deeper than a man's track. They set bear traps for it but it would never go near them. It ripped the bark off trees and rooted up huge rotten logs as though it were looking for grubs. They organized hunts for it and the lumbermen who were then at Mud Lake came with their rifles and lay out all night by the paths watching, but with no success. A dozen people have told me they saw its track with their own eyes and it was unlike anything ever seen or heard of. One afternoon one of the children saw it peeping in the window. She yelled and old Mrs.Michelin grabbed a gun and ran for the door. She just saw the top of its head disappearing into a clump of willows. She fired where she saw the bushes moving and thinks she wounded it. She says too that it had a ruff of white across the top of its head. At night they used to bar the door with a stout birch beam and sleep upstairs, taking guns and axes with them. The dogs knew it was there too, for the family would bear them growl and snarl when it approached. Often it must have driven them into the river, for they would be soaking wet in the morning. One night the dogs faced the thing and it lashed at them with a stick or club, which hit a corner of the house with such force it made the beams tremble. The old man and boys carried guns wherever they went, but never got a shot at it. For two winters it was there. They believe to this day it was one of the devil's agents or more likely 'the old feller' himself."
This item was kindly brought to our notice by Mr. Bruce S. Wright, Director of the Northeastern Wildlife Station, operated cooperatively by the Wildlife Management Institute of Washington, D. C. and the University of New Brunswick at Fredericton, N.B.
From the cases cited above, together with the now-massive reports of the Sasquatches--now having continued for over a century--and the numerous other isolated incidents claimed by people to have occurred all across Canada, it would seem manifest that at least one ...type of hairy Primitives or submen were once widely distributed over the arctic and subarctic belts of North America. Further, it would now appear to be increasingly difficult to assert positively that none of these could have survived until today. The obvious question is then--and it is quite permissible--what exactly might these creatures be?
We have mentioned the name of [Harold] Gladwin. This student, though never professionally employed as an anthropologist or archaeologist, prosecuted a great deal of worthwhile and original fieldwork; and the foreword to his book was written by none less than Earnest Hooton. In this preface, moreover, Hooton states that, while several of Gladwin's opinions were not then acceptable to established thinking [Singling out "The Nearchus Fantasy"-DD], his basic thesis required most careful consideration. This thesis states simply that several waves of Hominids passed over the Bering Strait from eastern Asia and thence spread all over the New World. Gladwin's chronology hints at, first, subhominids (such as Pithecanthropines) arriving; next, Neanderthal types; then representatives of what we call Primitives (as represented today by the Bushmen, the Negrillos, and the Negritos); then some early Modern Men of, in his estimation, a Proto-Caucasoid, or Australoid type [What Gladwin actually specifies is the Australoid type and he basically assumes Neanderthal or Homo erectus traits "in solution"-DD]; [Then Negroids or proto-Negroids, becoming Folsom man-another hotly contested item,] and finally the Mongoloid[s, Algonquin-] Amerinds and Eskimos [Counting each one SEPARATELY, and lastly Armenoid Arawaks-cum-Polynesians crossing both the Indian and Pacific Oceans, genetically snowballing all the way and arriving during the Classical Period-DD].
Whether all these types did so immigrate to the New World is, of course, very far from being accepted: in fact, it is only very recently that it has even been considered that any hominids, other than modern Mongoloids, ever reached North America. But, the possibility that more primitive peoples did so, cannot be positively denied; while there seems to be some valid reason for supposing that some did. The Pekin Pithecanthropines lived at the same latitude and on the edge of the same vegetational belt as the ABSMs of Canada, and we have recently received information from Professor B. F. Porshnev of the Russian Academy of Science that [Neanderthaloid-Chuchunaa-]ABSMs have now been reported from far eastern Siberia. There is no reason why such creatures should not have crossed over the Bering Strait. If they did so, in either the first or middle Interglacial, along with several other large mammals, there is no reason why later, more developed types, such
as the Neanderthalers (who were available in far eastern Asia) should not also have done so; and, still later, the Negrito-Negrillo or Pigmy type; then the Proto-Caucasoid, or Australoids; and,[Plus the others in between that GLADWIN was actually concerned with-DD] finally, Mongoloids. As each of these successive waves of more highly cultured races appeared, the former immigrants must have been pushed back into the less hospitable areas.And, it is from just such areas throughout South, Central, and North America that reports of hairy primitives and other ABSMs emanate today!
- ---
[BTW, E. A. Hootin was happy with H. Gladwin's work because Gladwin made frequent usage of Hootin's works. The theory is of course considered very badly racist today. The base data is from a comparison of human skulls. Since that is a specialization of mine, I know exactly what they are talking about although it would probably go right by most readers of both Gladwin and Sanderson. However I had always thought that Sanderson's badly misleading retelling of the theory would be much better left off simply because he was basically putting words in Gladwin's mouth and then saying that "He said it!" The theory is out of favor but the basic idea is sound once you say only that primitive humans supposedly crossed the landbridge, therefore why could not their more primitive predecessors do likewise?]
VII Some Final Comments
The last of the Neanderthals of Europe as recognised by Archaeology lasted up to about 25000 years ago in refuge areas of Spain, France and Italy, but apparently also in other areas such as the Caucasus Mountains-and by that late date, they had begun to adopt some of the tool types and lifestyle of the newcomers-settlers of modern Homo sapiens from Africa. If most of the Neanderthalers which survived as the Almas were dispossed refugees and apparantly lost most of their cultural development (Although probably not including woodworking, if Sanderson is right about Wudewasas), then the latest/Perigordian-Neanderthals that went north with the forest zone and apparently adopted a Reindeer-hunter lifestyle did not regress, they simply moved Eastward and into obscurity. But from the accounts of the Chuchunaa, Tunijuk and Wendigoes, they continued making stone blade tools and some antler and ivory tools, continued to use fire and hide clothing, and continued to build pit-houses (the stone-circle huts allegedly built by Toonijuk are similar in principle to the old Neanderthal huts built up with mammoth-bone bases.
And according to Mark Hall, this type of Hominid is definitely represented by known bony remains found in Greenland, the Gardarene skull AKA "Homo gardarensis". This is a skull of a vague Neanderthaloid pattern but larger and more coarsely made than usual. Indications are that this individual was very large in life; six feet six inches tall and 400-450 pounds has been suggested. Hall reprints photos from its original newspaper announcement in his discussion and I reproduce them here:
[Gardar Cranium Above, Lower Jaw Below]
[Original Newspaper Notice]
[From Mark A Hall, Living Fossils]
["Solo Man" skull cast from Java to show comparable profile]
The Greenland skull is sometimes explained away as being a deformed skull of a modern human. In fact it has the same characteristics as fossil human types. These fossil skulls are in fact also explained away by Creationists as being human beings suffering the same sorts of deformities. It need not be necessary to insist on the deformity part: since Neanderthals are classified as a subtype of Homo sapiens by the majority of experts, the classification is much the same whether the Trolls, Toonijuks and Wendigoes are outsized-Neanderthals or merely deformed Homo sapiens-because Neanderthals would still be Homo sapiens. And actually, if the large boreal-forest variety of Neanderthal called Marked Hominid and exemplified by the Chuchunaa is as advanced and adaptable as the indications go, they are on top of the game. Until they ran into firearms, they were the ones that had all the advantages over the regular humans that came into their environment. They didn't even need dogs (which they hated anyway, but they could kill without much bother)
[Neanderthal Deerhunters, Reconstruction by Jose Antonio Penas at
http://japa2.cgsociety.org/gallery/539267/ ]