Possibly-but this object (?a purported track cast?)actually has no features to identify it as a (?print?) of any kind of a foot other than a similarity in shape. There are no individual toes and no other identifiable anatomical hallmarks which would indicate a ball of the foot or any skeletal structure inside the footprint, if that is what it is being stated to be.
If This Was In The Pacific Northwest, would it be Bigfoot?
Possibly-but this object (?a purported track cast?)actually has no features to identify it as a (?print?) of any kind of a foot other than a similarity in shape. There are no individual toes and no other identifiable anatomical hallmarks which would indicate a ball of the foot or any skeletal structure inside the footprint, if that is what it is being stated to be.
ReplyDeletejust a bit of fun actually mate, like the fox carcass I did last time. More oddities to come.
ReplyDelete