1942? Yet they're all wearing Erbsenmuster 1944-pattern uniforms.
They're all too well-fed. Their haircuts would have a WWII-era German NCO in apoplexy. The rifles are vaguely similar to the Mauser Kar98k, but why is no-one carrying an automatic weapon, despite one man carrying a belt of linked machine gun ammo?
1942, yet they're all wearing Erbsenmuster 1944-pattern uniforms.
All the soldiers are too well-fed, yet their uniforms display nothing of the tightness and short-sleeved look of WWII German kit.
The haircuts would send a German NCO apoplectic!
The rifles look vaguely like Mauser Kar 98ks, but where are the automatic weapons? Why is one man carrying a belt of linked MG ammo when everyone is armed with bolt-action rifles?
The "soldiers" look completely non-military, with none of the discipline and purposefulness displayed by service personnel.
I vote for a hoax perpetrated by a bunch of mates with access to a few bits of repro military kit.
Obviously fake.
ReplyDelete1942? Yet they're all wearing Erbsenmuster 1944-pattern uniforms.
They're all too well-fed. Their haircuts would have a WWII-era German NCO in apoplexy. The rifles are vaguely similar to the Mauser Kar98k, but why is no-one carrying an automatic weapon, despite one man carrying a belt of linked machine gun ammo?
Obviously fake.
ReplyDelete1942, yet they're all wearing Erbsenmuster 1944-pattern uniforms.
All the soldiers are too well-fed, yet their uniforms display nothing of the tightness and short-sleeved look of WWII German kit.
The haircuts would send a German NCO apoplectic!
The rifles look vaguely like Mauser Kar 98ks, but where are the automatic weapons? Why is one man carrying a belt of linked MG ammo when everyone is armed with bolt-action rifles?
The "soldiers" look completely non-military, with none of the discipline and purposefulness displayed by service personnel.
I vote for a hoax perpetrated by a bunch of mates with access to a few bits of repro military kit.
maximus otter