It is undeniable that J.R.R.Tolkien was a fine writer, and that The Lord of the Rings is a masterpeice, but is it really necessary to use his imagery over again when cryptozoology is concerned. It was bad enough when a light-hearted comment has ended up with Homo florisiensis being described as `hobbits` for the last six or seven years, but now a strange animal recently stoned to death in Panama is being described as a 'Gollum.'
Even more irritating, it is being described as a 'Montauk Monster'. It ain't a monster, and it ain't from New York's Montauk business district like the dead raccoon that washed up there a few years back
I know I am rapidly becoming a grumpy old sod, but this `branding` of unknown animals, especially when they are relatively benign, is beginning to get annoying.
It's a dead sloth by the way...
Thanks to Judith J, Liam P, and Kithra amongst others who drew my attention to this peculiar tale.
Read the whole story on Kithra's blog
No comments:
Post a Comment