A couple of days ago we published an analysis of a recent bigfoot photograph by someone called Autumn from the Oregon Bigfoot society. It can be found here . However, in the interests of free speech etc, we are also publishing a rebuttal from the people who took the original photograph. We have kept it exactly as we received it:
Hello everyone, Jeffrey from sanger Paranormal. Autumn from http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/ released a statement on her blog about the recent Bigfoot photo from the Sierra National Forest. She analazied all the photo's and came to the conclusion that a tree was causing the illusion
and the shadow that caused the Bigfoot image. Well, she was wrong! If you would take a look at her analysis, where she circled the tree in front of that man, by the way, that's me, saying that tree was the cause of the shadow and the darkness on it which caused the illusion of the Bigfoot...But wait, if you take a look at the Bigfoot photo you can see the tree in front of the bigfoot, that's the tree that she circled saying that's what caused the illusion. HUH!!!!!Bigfoot or no Bigfoot the tree is still there so how can that be the cause....I tried to go on her web site http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/ and to see if she had any other analysis of past Bigfoot sightings but I found out that you have to become a member and pay a fee to see these photo's and to go inside her sight. W.....H...A...T....Pay a fee $4.95 a month...Oh, I get it now!!!
Please allow me to rebut the rebuttal. *grin* The personal attack on the fact that I request folks to help pay for the bandwidth used by hosting files was just... well, expected.
ReplyDeleteWHY is there a members' section on OregonBigfoot.com?
You can read about it here:
http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/blog/bigfoot/the-most-thorough-field-report-ive-ever-seen/
Thanks. :)
Autumn