tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post5513379902764104257..comments2024-01-05T05:02:20.353+00:00Comments on CRYPTOZOOLOGY ONLINE: Still on the Track: LOOK WHAT JUST TURNED UP IN MY YOUTUBE EMAILUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-50972645720783919042010-05-13T22:12:35.073+01:002010-05-13T22:12:35.073+01:00Also, if you don't mind, would you mind being ...Also, if you don't mind, would you mind being more specific w. the location of Lough BranRuhRyanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13929103558164092741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-61455071522463562862010-05-13T22:04:11.874+01:002010-05-13T22:04:11.874+01:00I believe you.I believe you.RuhRyanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13929103558164092741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-4604196466828327102010-05-11T13:32:09.976+01:002010-05-11T13:32:09.976+01:00The two appendages on the head still sound like th...The two appendages on the head still sound like the ears of the master-otter, and are diagnostic of the type.<br /><br />I also do not "Believe in the Loch Ness Monster" but I am afraid our correspondant would fail to grasp the importance of what I mean by that statement. Plesiosaur-shaped creatures are indeed (rarely) reported there, and similar reports occur throughout recorded history and worldwide. There is no good reason to gainsay the entire category on a matter of "belief." There is also no reason to call any such a creature "The Loch Ness Monster" even if one should happen to be in Loch Ness any more than a large eel, seal or otter in that same lake should be called by that same name. Using the name gives the false impression that there is only a single underlying cause for all the reports, and that is a most decidely untrue assumption.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com