tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post4121375665431344364..comments2024-01-05T05:02:20.353+00:00Comments on CRYPTOZOOLOGY ONLINE: Still on the Track: CRYPTOZOOLOGY: Two more from Dale - thunderbirds and a sea serpentUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-78832959869358352052011-07-11T14:07:41.435+01:002011-07-11T14:07:41.435+01:00Y'know, Jon, increasingly when I put up a blog...Y'know, Jon, increasingly when I put up a blog discussing a composite cryptid category or a category with a series of mistaken observations as well as some possibly valid ones, you describe my blogs as about "A" Cryptid, as if I was saying all Freshwater monsters or all Sea monsters were "Only one thing." <br /><br />Which is ridiculous.<br /><br />Today's blog is a reprint of an earlier CFZ blog which integrally refers to TWO different sea monsters, one of which I take to be a mistake (A whale) and the other one I take to be the same as one of Heuvelmans' categories of Sea-serpents (the Marine Saurian) I use a variety of "Pristichampsus'" depictions to show how witnesses' impressions make some differences in the one category (the same as "Dr. Shuker's Leviathan) and then I use the opportunity to say why I think that Heuvelmans' and Champagne's Marine Saurians are two different things.<br /><br />Which is actually three things, one of them a known species, but the larger category illustrated by five different depictions, with the goal of showing those five are all the same but <em> different</em> to the last two.<br /><br />I should also mention that from the description Tim (Pristichampsus) gave of the last creature illustrated, he must also be a regular reader of the CFZ blog, among other things.<br /><br />Best Wishes, Dale D.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com