tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post2228147253157254582..comments2024-01-05T05:02:20.353+00:00Comments on CRYPTOZOOLOGY ONLINE: Still on the Track: PERUVIAN "GIANT SNAKE" PICTURES RELEASED THROUGH THE CFZ BLOGGOUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger36125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-32125311755243164142014-06-19T16:48:21.634+01:002014-06-19T16:48:21.634+01:00it is a large snack? look under thermal to get a b...it is a large snack? look under thermal to get a better look?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-44129282039325577042013-10-01T18:48:33.494+01:002013-10-01T18:48:33.494+01:00This is rather stupid, just a sand bar.This is rather stupid, just a sand bar.Tom Blackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08703253387593571339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-60398843856257460862012-05-17T19:08:28.739+01:002012-05-17T19:08:28.739+01:00Wow! I am coming late to the party but I came acro...Wow! I am coming late to the party but I came across this and just was floored. Seriously the titan boa which is the largest snake we have a fossile record for was only 50ft long and the Warners are claiming like 131 ft? Look I am not sure oxygen levels would support that. Not to mention just the weight of that thing would leave definitive tracks in any mud. How about there is no wake left in the water of this thing moving. In fact looking at the pictures there are not any even a ripple. Watch a 18 ft crocodile that weighs over a ton leaves a huge wake in the water when swimming on the surface. <br /><br /> Oh and Pangui the Tropical Rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus)does in habit Peru.spacepup13https://www.blogger.com/profile/02798939736489773489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-71414807947655204482009-07-31T15:33:27.298+01:002009-07-31T15:33:27.298+01:00If you sharpen the image and adjust the levels you...If you sharpen the image and adjust the levels you can clearly see that it is just sand or sediment and that the "head" isn't even connected to "the body"..<br />Perhaps they have a .tif that they could release to end the debate for once and for all?Michael A Swannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14957465167870652474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-81891744284454948372009-07-31T15:29:45.009+01:002009-07-31T15:29:45.009+01:00If you sharpen the image and then 'auto-level&...If you sharpen the image and then 'auto-level' it you can see a lot more, the image that they have supplied is quite washed out and very low-res for the camera that they had.<br />I wonder, do they have a .tif of it that we can see, that would surely end the debate for once and for all.Michael A Swannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14957465167870652474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-39919135388906383392009-07-22T19:40:37.477+01:002009-07-22T19:40:37.477+01:00thanks Mike and Greg for releasing this picture oh...thanks Mike and Greg for releasing this picture ohhhhhhh......its really great work.<br /><br />smith<br />-----------<br /><a href="http://www.directstartv.com/jump.html?referID=oa-1700-149074" rel="nofollow"> Free Direct TV </a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-42027376761674758592009-06-21T13:09:01.236+01:002009-06-21T13:09:01.236+01:00That's really sweet - thanks dudeThat's really sweet - thanks dudeJon Downeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03467805661081755044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-3818850165480689952009-06-21T13:00:14.308+01:002009-06-21T13:00:14.308+01:00A mudbank with eyebrows is a simulacrum, not a sna...A mudbank with eyebrows is a simulacrum, not a snake.It's not the sceptics who need to put their money where their mouths are and step up to the plate,the burden of proof lies with the proponents, who keep shifting focus from mudbanks/snakes to channels to shadowy things in rivers to newspaper reports without ever being specific and then have the temerity to express dismay at perfectly reasonable negative comments.<br />What is it about these channels that proves the existence of giant snakes? Why do giant snakes need to make channels when they could cover the distance overland between 2 bodies of water in seconds?<br />I don't know if there are annual awards for standards in webmastery but Jon Downes's patience and fairness in handling all this certainly merits one.The Warners have rewarded Jon's courtesy with procrastination and now they have stopped posting anything but vague declarations of interest from unnamed scientists and TV channels.<br /> Their refusal to address reasonable criticism and unqualified adherence to their claims is beginning to feel like the Emperor's New Clothes syndrome.<br />a week ago I commented that we all deserved some believable evidence sooner rather than later.The Warners have completely failed to deliver.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-40344730349235245212009-06-21T05:41:21.454+01:002009-06-21T05:41:21.454+01:00I have been to the Amazon jungle and have seen fir...I have been to the Amazon jungle and have seen first hand what the rainy season leaves behind, and i can tell you that if thats a sand bar, then its one of the only ones in the area which has browes.<br />Look,im reading allot of negative material, what almost seems to be bashing this legitamate expedition which neither of this panel has been on, or witnessed.<br />Put your money where your mouth is and step up to the plate and read the facts from related news papers some of which were documented by the very own Peruvian army.<br />The fact is, Percy Fawsett documented channels and the warner expedition has confirmed this previously documented information which was completed 100 years ago.<br />This cannot be egnored unless we wish to remain close minded.<br />I think that this Warner expedition was an incredible thing for science, which was 100 years overdue. Thank you Greg and Mike.<br />We need more people like you who puts there money where there mouth is and exacutes a plan and follows it through.<br />I would like to offer my services and a contrabution of money to take this important second expedition to the next level for verification and more impotantly to document the configuration of these obvious channels which quiteb simply CANNOT be egnored.<br />Thank you, Stevesteve martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01561331732505712687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-3415322853757362382009-06-16T13:02:08.268+01:002009-06-16T13:02:08.268+01:00Mud,mud,reptilian mud
Nothing quite like it for he...Mud,mud,reptilian mud<br />Nothing quite like it for heating the blood<br />So follow me follow<br />Down to the bloggo<br />And there we shall comment on glorious mudAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-33746945504450874372009-06-16T10:19:36.900+01:002009-06-16T10:19:36.900+01:00Check out this picture outline of where the snake ...Check out this picture outline of where the snake seems to be! Maybe post this on the blog so everyone can see?<br /><br />cheers!<br /><br />http://i39.tinypic.com/2yo32wx.jpgNick Hoylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11757542632759621831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-36456401578928073462009-06-15T21:22:48.594+01:002009-06-15T21:22:48.594+01:00Something just occurred to me: if you look at the ...Something just occurred to me: if you look at the red text in the labelled version of the first photo, then the elongated shape in the second, you get the impression the Warners think it's the bright water thats the snake, not the mudbank.The patch of bright water in the main channel is the head and another patch in the top of the pic is the tail, with the rest of the body in the channel.<br />Anacondas aren't silvery though.This is obviously an OOPP - Out Of Place Pilchard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-67535952246257391352009-06-15T15:25:26.697+01:002009-06-15T15:25:26.697+01:00I've been looking at this for a bit, and I can...I've been looking at this for a bit, and I can see some weird patterns and shapes going on that might justify this monster snake hanging on the river bank. thoughts?<br /><br />http://i39.tinypic.com/2yo32wx.jpgNick Hoylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11757542632759621831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-3684741975253539122009-06-15T15:14:38.531+01:002009-06-15T15:14:38.531+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nick Hoylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11757542632759621831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-69834311007414782672009-06-15T11:56:11.802+01:002009-06-15T11:56:11.802+01:00Could someone who can see where the snake is suppo...Could someone who can see where the snake is supposed to be perhaps do the rest of us a favour and take the picture and draw the outline of the snake over it, so that it's easier to see?<br /><br />Cheers.Adminhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09312424708803462335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-81577140961971110112009-06-14T16:50:49.914+01:002009-06-14T16:50:49.914+01:00I have found many anacondas in the Amazon. Non of ...I have found many anacondas in the Amazon. Non of them waved at me to make me see them. Some were disguised under leaves, some were disguised under mud. Some were right there in the river. <br />You all people know that most giant (or big) animals mimetise, disguise, and use covers to protect themselves from danger (mainly from man). So don't expect the Yacumama the Warners believe they found be all dressed up and saying "here I am". It is under a cover.<br />That is not a mudbank or sandbar. A rock formation maybe, but there are no rocks on the Amazon.<br />Never saw a mudbank or sandbar with a protruding smaller end towards the river. It would just slide down.<br />The river looks turbid because it must have been raining on the area. <br />ALSO, THERE ARE NO "Rattlesnakes" in the Peruvian Amazon.Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02736248864239807346noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-24408278366088019522009-06-14T14:21:22.227+01:002009-06-14T14:21:22.227+01:00Is there supposed to be something in those pics po...Is there supposed to be something in those pics posted on the site? Because there is nothing more than the rocks there.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14477705402815288405noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-48022520251502072252009-06-14T08:47:47.409+01:002009-06-14T08:47:47.409+01:00Yeah and just look at the high quality high defini...Yeah and just look at the high quality high definition photographs<br /><br />Very easy to make out lots of great detail behind those clouds.<br /><br />Makes it about on the same level of most ufo shots ever taken and dont forget the saskwatch<br /><br />LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLPeterGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04860185779868008903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-49552169166769712242009-06-14T08:24:54.456+01:002009-06-14T08:24:54.456+01:00Bigfoot? Urinating behind a tree in the Amazon? Wr...Bigfoot? Urinating behind a tree in the Amazon? Wrong neck of the woods entirely. Must be a mapinguary!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-19315975143916823192009-06-14T08:17:29.941+01:002009-06-14T08:17:29.941+01:00Nanano,where have you been dude? I followed the li...Nanano,where have you been dude? I followed the link and found the same photo I mistook for the 130foot anaconda earlier in the week.The Warners didn't take the photo,it's nowhere near 130 feet and it's probably dead.The real yacumama is the one cunningly disguised as a mudbank.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-16185535358215060962009-06-14T03:30:26.517+01:002009-06-14T03:30:26.517+01:00This is so retarded even George Noory wouldn't...This is so retarded even George Noory wouldn't buy itCRAIG DOUGLAS ETC.https://www.blogger.com/profile/03303718554484719537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-78117247264330578402009-06-14T03:08:15.720+01:002009-06-14T03:08:15.720+01:00Lame... Sorry... but this is an astoundingly worth...Lame... Sorry... but this is an astoundingly worthless photo of nothing worth publishing. Please tell me you have SOMETHING to show for your expedition, this is likely the most ridiculous attempt at photographic evidence I have ever witnessed... I can only hope that there are better photos in your additional evidence, otherwise (and unfortunately) this expedition has produced not only NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER, but it has also shown that the research team is perhaps off their rockers... or perhaps disingenuous... Bummer.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07749274503729170592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-48447821374464560842009-06-14T00:57:04.326+01:002009-06-14T00:57:04.326+01:00i am surprised since they are photographers in tha...i am surprised since they are photographers in that sort of place they dont carry some kind of infrared lenses or camera thingys to tell if its a live object or not.Dabbler's Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10955956416594679259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-35300720838782606922009-06-13T22:53:35.417+01:002009-06-13T22:53:35.417+01:00I think I see Big Foot urinating behind a tree on ...I think I see Big Foot urinating behind a tree on the left.Dee Deehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09372112785870612713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-21201012682899851802009-06-13T20:57:13.627+01:002009-06-13T20:57:13.627+01:00Why show these photos which are fuzzy and far away...Why show these photos which are fuzzy and far away when you can show the one in the following web page? <br /><br />http://naturalplane.blogspot.com/2009/06/photo-leviathan-yacumama-anaconda-found.html<br /><br />How would you like to have been in that little canoe next to that ... er, "sandbar" ?nananohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01020304454556331183noreply@blogger.com