tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post1427003580324313396..comments2024-01-05T05:02:20.353+00:00Comments on CRYPTOZOOLOGY ONLINE: Still on the Track: THE DIALOGUE ON THE SUMATRA HAIR SAMPLES CONTINUES...Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-36402785759588839602010-11-29T01:20:52.965+00:002010-11-29T01:20:52.965+00:00I'd feel better about Highland Tiger's com...I'd feel better about Highland Tiger's comments if he hadn't proven himself such a passive-aggressive little shit in the past. Reading his arguments with Richard Freeman on H.T.'s anti-CFZ blog don't inspire confidence. If that blog were a pub, the landlord would have said, "Oy! You two — OUT!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16505569.post-55514082401153032212010-11-28T12:52:09.197+00:002010-11-28T12:52:09.197+00:00Points well taken. It is extremely urgent to get h...Points well taken. It is extremely urgent to get hold of these other sample hairs if at all possible in order to continue the process of identification.<br /><br />And, although I hate to keep sounding like a broken record, if there is BOTH a homind AND an apelike creature running around and being claimed as "THE Orang Pendek" by witnesses, you will inevitably only come up with HALF of the solution to the problem whatever the final identification turns out to be. If you identify the hairs as an orangutan, you STILL have not identified "THE Orang Pendek" that Sanderson and Heuvelmans wrote about, which is clearly a hominid. If it turns out the hair samples ARE hominid, then all well and good, but then you STILL will not have identified whatever-it-is that is leaving the "Ape" tracks with an opposed big toe.<br /><br />By starting out the expedition with the premise that there WAS only ONE sort of Orang Pendek, you set yourselves up for only an incomplete solution in either case. And THAT was the fact I had been trying to impress upon the CFZ from the onset.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com